Here’s an idea from my blog http://blinkingti.me: an algorithm in order to bottle the very best of top-level editorial decision-making. It could, of course, be expanded to a wider leadership context. Why *not* search out and define what an “applied intuition” might exactly mean?
How about this?
How about we took the twenty years of Peter Preston’s editorship of the Guardian newspaper – analysing and cross-referencing every single story that was published, along with every single journalistic angle that was observed and chosen?
Then, just for fun, we could do the same with Alan Rusbridger’s twenty years just finished, at the helm of the same paper.
Yes. I know. Two questions arise. The first being: is it possible? The second being: why do it?
Firstly, the first. We’d have to set up some kind of criteria, that is true. Maybe something along the following lines:
- each story could be defined in terms of:
- register (ie complexity of sentence structure etc)
- subject matter
- visibility (ie how prominent the paper chose to foreground it)
- how long-running it became (ie a single-article story vs a narrative arc over time)
- defining the angles would be more difficult…
View original post 496 more words